{"success":true,"data":[{"id":"father-child-bond","slug":"father-child-bond","title":"Father-child bond","summary":"Track where policy, courts, schools, services, and media either preserve or weaken safe father-child contact. The rail treats children as people with relationships, not as proof points in adult conflict.","railId":"father-child-bond","signals":["Contact orders that exist on paper but are hard to enforce in practice.","Local programs that restore safe contact without turning ordinary parenting conflict into permanent exclusion.","News stories where the child outcome is unnamed while the adult conflict dominates the frame."],"receipts":["Court statistics on custody, visitation, enforcement, and modification outcomes.","Longitudinal research on father involvement, attachment, school, health, and adult outcomes.","Program evaluations for mediation, parenting coordination, and reunification services."],"openQuestions":["Which jurisdictions measure restored contact, not only case closure?","Where do safety findings justify restrictions, and where is contact loss just administrative drift?"],"repairPaths":["Build a jurisdiction-by-jurisdiction contact-restoration watch list.","Collect source-backed examples of repairs worth copying and failures worth reforming."],"atlasLayerIds":["family-justice","positive-wins"],"moneyTrailIds":["money-father-child-bond"],"depthReport":{"id":"report-father-child-bond-depth-v1","title":"Father-child bond depth scaffold","summary":"Public-safe depth scaffold for this dossier: current claim, source need, counterargument, refutation standard, and repair path before stronger claims are promoted.","status":"draft_public_scaffold","reportHref":null,"scopeIds":["global"],"updatedAt":"2026-06-06"},"claims":[{"id":"claim-father-child-bond-public-frame","text":"Contact orders that exist on paper but are hard to enforce in practice.","confidence":"developing","evidenceLevel":"Public scaffold source request","sourceIds":["src-father-child-bond-public-source-request"],"scopeIds":["global"],"counterargument":"This frame may be too broad until jurisdiction-specific sources and counterexamples are attached.","refutationStandard":"Attach stronger public sources, counterexamples, or outcome data that materially changes the claim.","repairPath":"Keep the claim in scaffold status until receipts, source gaps, and public-safe remedies are reviewed."}],"sourceLedger":[{"id":"src-father-child-bond-public-source-request","title":"Father-child bond public source packet","sourceType":"official_or_research_source_request","publisher":null,"url":null,"verificationStatus":"source_requested","scopeIds":["global"],"neededForClaimIds":["claim-father-child-bond-public-frame"],"publicSafeNote":"Placeholder source ledger item; publish stronger details only after source review and redaction."}],"confidence":"developing","lastReviewedAt":"2026-06-06"},{"id":"family-courts","slug":"family-courts","title":"Courts, custody, and due process","summary":"Follow how hearings, orders, legal aid, delays, expert services, custody defaults, and enforcement shape family life. The rail looks for patterns that can be sourced, compared, and repaired.","railId":"family-courts","signals":["Backlogs and repeated adjournments that keep children and parents in limbo.","Asymmetry between order-making and order-enforcement.","Use of evaluators, guardians, supervised-contact providers, or classes without clear outcome reporting."],"receipts":["Ministry of Justice, state court, CAFCASS, or administrative family-court statistics.","Budget documents for legal aid, court operations, supervised contact, and contracted services.","Published rules, practice directions, appellate decisions, and court-performance reports."],"openQuestions":["Where do delays predict contact loss or coerced settlement?","Which vendors or mandated services have public outcome audits?"],"repairPaths":["Create a court-transparency receipt list by jurisdiction.","Compare custody/contact defaults against child-outcome research and appeal data."],"atlasLayerIds":["family-justice","gender-policy-power"],"moneyTrailIds":["money-family-courts"],"depthReport":{"id":"report-croatia-family-justice-depth-v1","title":"Croatia family-justice scope and service-routing report","summary":"First public-safe report scaffold for Croatia family-justice depth: jurisdiction graph, source gaps, counterarguments, and lawful repair paths before any institution-level claim is promoted.","status":"draft_public_scaffold","reportHref":null,"scopeIds":["country-croatia","county-karlovacka","city-ogulin","county-istria","municipality-oprtalj","city-buje","service-area-buje-oprtalj-family-justice"],"updatedAt":"2026-Q2"},"claims":[{"id":"claim-croatia-graph-before-local-claims","text":"Croatia family-justice reporting must separate national law, county layer, municipality context, and service routing before making institution-level claims.","confidence":"developing","evidenceLevel":"Scope model plus official-source request","sourceIds":["src-hr-law-scope-map","src-croatia-administrative-scope-map"],"scopeIds":["country-croatia","county-karlovacka","county-istria"],"counterargument":"A reader could argue that a national-only frame is enough until local records are collected.","refutationStandard":"Attach official sources showing which institution or office owns the process at each local layer.","repairPath":"Publish a source-led jurisdiction map before converting local receipts into public claims."},{"id":"claim-ogulin-karlovacka-parent","text":"Ogulin belongs under Karlovačka županija in the Observatory scope graph, not as a direct child of Croatia.","confidence":"sourced","evidenceLevel":"Administrative hierarchy source request","sourceIds":["src-karlovacka-ogulin-official-map"],"scopeIds":["county-karlovacka","city-ogulin"],"counterargument":"For reader navigation, a flattened city list may be easier than a county hierarchy.","refutationStandard":"Use official county/city references and keep flattened navigation only as a UI shortcut, not as the graph model.","repairPath":"Keep Ogulin under the county node and attach official county/city records as the source packet matures."},{"id":"claim-oprtalj-municipality-context","text":"Općina Oprtalj should be treated as a municipality/local context scope rather than a city scope until official administrative source coverage is attached.","confidence":"sourced","evidenceLevel":"Administrative scope classification","sourceIds":["src-oprtalj-municipality-official"],"scopeIds":["county-istria","municipality-oprtalj"],"counterargument":"English readers may use city/place language casually when looking for local context.","refutationStandard":"Use official municipality naming in the graph and allow plain-language labels only where they do not change the scope type.","repairPath":"Keep public copy framed as municipality context and exclude private family facts from the public layer."},{"id":"claim-buje-service-routing-needs-source","text":"Buje should be modeled as the service hub for the Oprtalj corridor only as a source request until official social-service coverage is attached.","confidence":"needs_receipts","evidenceLevel":"Service-routing source needed","sourceIds":["src-buje-service-routing-needed"],"scopeIds":["city-buje","service-area-buje-oprtalj-family-justice"],"counterargument":"The service route may be owned by a differently named office, shared center, or county-level structure.","refutationStandard":"Attach official social-service coverage documentation showing Oprtalj routing, office name, and jurisdiction.","repairPath":"Phrase public routing as “appears to route through Buje” until the source packet confirms the exact institution."},{"id":"claim-local-sensitive-public-redaction","text":"Local Croatian family-justice scopes must stay public-redacted and avoid private-identifying family facts, case numbers, addresses, and raw allegations.","confidence":"developing","evidenceLevel":"Publication safety rule","sourceIds":["src-public-redaction-policy","src-review-promotion-checklist"],"scopeIds":["city-ogulin","municipality-oprtalj","city-buje","service-area-buje-oprtalj-family-justice"],"counterargument":"Public impact stories often become vivid only when personal details are included.","refutationStandard":"Require reviewed, independently public sources before any identifying detail moves into public copy.","repairPath":"Use private source packets, review inbox promotion, and public-safe summaries instead of public case narratives."}],"sourceLedger":[{"id":"src-hr-law-scope-map","title":"Croatia family law and child-welfare process source packet","sourceType":"official_source_request","publisher":null,"url":null,"verificationStatus":"source_requested","scopeIds":["country-croatia"],"neededForClaimIds":["claim-croatia-graph-before-local-claims"],"publicSafeNote":"Needed to separate statutory duties, service duties, and court process without private case material."},{"id":"src-croatia-administrative-scope-map","title":"Croatia county, city, and municipality administrative hierarchy","sourceType":"official_source_request","publisher":null,"url":null,"verificationStatus":"source_requested","scopeIds":["country-croatia","county-karlovacka","county-istria"],"neededForClaimIds":["claim-croatia-graph-before-local-claims"],"publicSafeNote":"Needed to prove the scope graph before local claim promotion."},{"id":"src-karlovacka-ogulin-official-map","title":"Karlovačka županija and Ogulin official locality records","sourceType":"official_source_request","publisher":null,"url":null,"verificationStatus":"source_requested","scopeIds":["county-karlovacka","city-ogulin"],"neededForClaimIds":["claim-ogulin-karlovacka-parent"],"publicSafeNote":"Needed to keep Ogulin attached to the correct county parent."},{"id":"src-oprtalj-municipality-official","title":"Općina Oprtalj official municipality records","sourceType":"official_source_request","publisher":null,"url":null,"verificationStatus":"source_requested","scopeIds":["county-istria","municipality-oprtalj"],"neededForClaimIds":["claim-oprtalj-municipality-context"],"publicSafeNote":"Needed to classify Oprtalj as municipality context without private facts."},{"id":"src-buje-service-routing-needed","title":"Buje social-service coverage for Oprtalj source packet","sourceType":"official_source_request","publisher":null,"url":null,"verificationStatus":"source_requested","scopeIds":["city-buje","service-area-buje-oprtalj-family-justice"],"neededForClaimIds":["claim-buje-service-routing-needs-source"],"publicSafeNote":"Needed before public copy can state the exact service-routing institution with confidence."},{"id":"src-public-redaction-policy","title":"Observatory public redaction rule for local-sensitive family-justice material","sourceType":"publication_rule","publisher":"Fathers Observatory","url":null,"verificationStatus":"policy_active","scopeIds":["city-ogulin","municipality-oprtalj","city-buje","service-area-buje-oprtalj-family-justice"],"neededForClaimIds":["claim-local-sensitive-public-redaction"],"publicSafeNote":"Keeps public copy source-led, redacted, and free of private-identifying facts."},{"id":"src-review-promotion-checklist","title":"Review inbox promotion checklist for public-safe claim release","sourceType":"publication_rule","publisher":"Fathers Observatory","url":null,"verificationStatus":"policy_active","scopeIds":["country-croatia"],"neededForClaimIds":["claim-local-sensitive-public-redaction"],"publicSafeNote":"Claims need confidence, source status, counterargument, and repair path before public promotion."}],"confidence":"developing","lastReviewedAt":"2026-06-06"},{"id":"child-support-pressure","slug":"child-support-pressure","title":"Child support, debt, and family pressure","summary":"Watch the line between child protection and debt escalation: orders, arrears, enforcement tools, employment shocks, public-benefit recovery, and poverty pressure.","railId":"child-support-pressure","signals":["Orders based on imputed income after job loss, illness, incarceration, or unstable work.","License suspension or enforcement actions that reduce earning capacity.","Public-benefit reimbursement rules that route payments through government recovery before household support."],"receipts":["US OCSE annual reports, state child-support dashboards, and arrears data.","OECD, national statistics, and poverty research on single-parent and nonresident-parent households.","Local rules for imputation, modification, interest, fees, and enforcement escalation."],"openQuestions":["Which rules increase collections and which rules create unpayable debt?","How often are payment barriers solved before punitive enforcement begins?"],"repairPaths":["Map rules for modification, arrears interest, license suspension, and benefit recovery.","Collect reform examples that increase actual support while reducing destructive debt."],"atlasLayerIds":["family-justice","manhood-health"],"moneyTrailIds":["money-child-support"],"depthReport":{"id":"report-child-support-pressure-depth-v1","title":"Child support, debt, and family pressure depth scaffold","summary":"Public-safe depth scaffold for this dossier: current claim, source need, counterargument, refutation standard, and repair path before stronger claims are promoted.","status":"draft_public_scaffold","reportHref":null,"scopeIds":["global"],"updatedAt":"2026-06-06"},"claims":[{"id":"claim-child-support-pressure-public-frame","text":"Orders based on imputed income after job loss, illness, incarceration, or unstable work.","confidence":"developing","evidenceLevel":"Public scaffold source request","sourceIds":["src-child-support-pressure-public-source-request"],"scopeIds":["global"],"counterargument":"This frame may be too broad until jurisdiction-specific sources and counterexamples are attached.","refutationStandard":"Attach stronger public sources, counterexamples, or outcome data that materially changes the claim.","repairPath":"Keep the claim in scaffold status until receipts, source gaps, and public-safe remedies are reviewed."}],"sourceLedger":[{"id":"src-child-support-pressure-public-source-request","title":"Child support, debt, and family pressure public source packet","sourceType":"official_or_research_source_request","publisher":null,"url":null,"verificationStatus":"source_requested","scopeIds":["global"],"neededForClaimIds":["claim-child-support-pressure-public-frame"],"publicSafeNote":"Placeholder source ledger item; publish stronger details only after source review and redaction."}],"confidence":"developing","lastReviewedAt":"2026-06-06"},{"id":"broken-bonds","slug":"broken-bonds","title":"Alienation, gatekeeping, and broken bonds","summary":"Cover patterns where a child-parent relationship is weakened, denied, manipulated, or repaired. The rail separates sourced behavior patterns from slogans and protects private children.","railId":"broken-bonds","signals":["Repeated missed contact with no practical enforcement path.","Narratives that erase one fit parent while treating the child’s grief as a side issue.","Reunification programs with transparent safety standards and outcome evidence."],"receipts":["Peer-reviewed research on parental gatekeeping, coercive control, alienating behaviors, and reunification outcomes.","Court findings or anonymized published decisions where the conduct is actually established.","Professional standards for child interviews, therapy, and supervised/reunification contact."],"openQuestions":["Which cases involve proven safety risk, and which involve avoidable relationship obstruction?","Which interventions repair bonds without exposing children to danger?"],"repairPaths":["Build a language guide that avoids both denial and overclaiming.","Collect repair-first models with published safeguards and outcomes."],"atlasLayerIds":["family-justice","narrative-climate"],"moneyTrailIds":["money-broken-bonds"],"depthReport":{"id":"report-broken-bonds-depth-v1","title":"Alienation, gatekeeping, and broken bonds depth scaffold","summary":"Public-safe depth scaffold for this dossier: current claim, source need, counterargument, refutation standard, and repair path before stronger claims are promoted.","status":"draft_public_scaffold","reportHref":null,"scopeIds":["global"],"updatedAt":"2026-06-06"},"claims":[{"id":"claim-broken-bonds-public-frame","text":"Repeated missed contact with no practical enforcement path.","confidence":"developing","evidenceLevel":"Public scaffold source request","sourceIds":["src-broken-bonds-public-source-request"],"scopeIds":["global"],"counterargument":"This frame may be too broad until jurisdiction-specific sources and counterexamples are attached.","refutationStandard":"Attach stronger public sources, counterexamples, or outcome data that materially changes the claim.","repairPath":"Keep the claim in scaffold status until receipts, source gaps, and public-safe remedies are reviewed."}],"sourceLedger":[{"id":"src-broken-bonds-public-source-request","title":"Alienation, gatekeeping, and broken bonds public source packet","sourceType":"official_or_research_source_request","publisher":null,"url":null,"verificationStatus":"source_requested","scopeIds":["global"],"neededForClaimIds":["claim-broken-bonds-public-frame"],"publicSafeNote":"Placeholder source ledger item; publish stronger details only after source review and redaction."}],"confidence":"developing","lastReviewedAt":"2026-06-06"},{"id":"daughters-and-father-loss","slug":"daughters-and-father-loss","title":"Daughters, sons, and father absence","summary":"Keep both daughters and sons visible. The rail tracks where father absence, exclusion, restoration, and involvement show up in health, identity, school, risk, family formation, and adulthood.","railId":"daughters-and-father-loss","signals":["Studies that separate outcomes for daughters and sons instead of flattening children into one category.","Stories where the child’s long-term relationship needs are missing from public coverage.","Local fatherhood programs that show measurable child outcomes, not just attendance."],"receipts":["Longitudinal cohort studies on father involvement and child/adult outcomes.","Education, health, justice, and family-formation statistics with sex-disaggregated data where available.","Program evaluations that measure child wellbeing, school, safety, and relationship stability."],"openQuestions":["Where does the evidence differ for daughters and sons?","Which interventions improve child outcomes rather than only adult compliance metrics?"],"repairPaths":["Create a source shelf for daughter-specific and son-specific father-involvement findings.","Profile programs that publish child outcome measures."],"atlasLayerIds":["manhood-health","positive-wins"],"moneyTrailIds":["money-children-outcomes"],"depthReport":{"id":"report-daughters-and-father-loss-depth-v1","title":"Daughters, sons, and father absence depth scaffold","summary":"Public-safe depth scaffold for this dossier: current claim, source need, counterargument, refutation standard, and repair path before stronger claims are promoted.","status":"draft_public_scaffold","reportHref":null,"scopeIds":["global"],"updatedAt":"2026-06-06"},"claims":[{"id":"claim-daughters-and-father-loss-public-frame","text":"Studies that separate outcomes for daughters and sons instead of flattening children into one category.","confidence":"developing","evidenceLevel":"Public scaffold source request","sourceIds":["src-daughters-and-father-loss-public-source-request"],"scopeIds":["global"],"counterargument":"This frame may be too broad until jurisdiction-specific sources and counterexamples are attached.","refutationStandard":"Attach stronger public sources, counterexamples, or outcome data that materially changes the claim.","repairPath":"Keep the claim in scaffold status until receipts, source gaps, and public-safe remedies are reviewed."}],"sourceLedger":[{"id":"src-daughters-and-father-loss-public-source-request","title":"Daughters, sons, and father absence public source packet","sourceType":"official_or_research_source_request","publisher":null,"url":null,"verificationStatus":"source_requested","scopeIds":["global"],"neededForClaimIds":["claim-daughters-and-father-loss-public-frame"],"publicSafeNote":"Placeholder source ledger item; publish stronger details only after source review and redaction."}],"confidence":"developing","lastReviewedAt":"2026-06-06"},{"id":"boys-without-fathers","slug":"boys-without-fathers","title":"Boys, school, discipline, and purpose","summary":"Watch male childhood and adolescence: school disengagement, discipline, mentorship, male teacher scarcity, risk, purpose, work pathways, and responsibility.","railId":"boys-without-fathers","signals":["Education gaps where boys fall behind in reading, attendance, discipline, or completion.","Mentoring and fatherhood-adjacent programs with credible evaluation rather than hype.","Policy debates that discuss boys only as risks, not as children needing guidance."],"receipts":["OECD PISA, national education statistics, attendance, discipline, and completion datasets.","Program evaluations for mentoring, apprenticeships, coaching, and responsible male role-model work.","Labor, health, and juvenile-justice data that connect school and family context."],"openQuestions":["Which interventions improve boys’ outcomes without lowering expectations?","Where are father absence, male teacher scarcity, and school discipline being measured together?"],"repairPaths":["Build a boys-and-school source list across education, labor, and health datasets.","Identify models that combine mentorship, work pathways, literacy, and family connection."],"atlasLayerIds":["manhood-health","positive-wins"],"moneyTrailIds":["money-boys-purpose"],"depthReport":{"id":"report-boys-without-fathers-depth-v1","title":"Boys, school, discipline, and purpose depth scaffold","summary":"Public-safe depth scaffold for this dossier: current claim, source need, counterargument, refutation standard, and repair path before stronger claims are promoted.","status":"draft_public_scaffold","reportHref":null,"scopeIds":["global"],"updatedAt":"2026-06-06"},"claims":[{"id":"claim-boys-without-fathers-public-frame","text":"Education gaps where boys fall behind in reading, attendance, discipline, or completion.","confidence":"developing","evidenceLevel":"Public scaffold source request","sourceIds":["src-boys-without-fathers-public-source-request"],"scopeIds":["global"],"counterargument":"This frame may be too broad until jurisdiction-specific sources and counterexamples are attached.","refutationStandard":"Attach stronger public sources, counterexamples, or outcome data that materially changes the claim.","repairPath":"Keep the claim in scaffold status until receipts, source gaps, and public-safe remedies are reviewed."}],"sourceLedger":[{"id":"src-boys-without-fathers-public-source-request","title":"Boys, school, discipline, and purpose public source packet","sourceType":"official_or_research_source_request","publisher":null,"url":null,"verificationStatus":"source_requested","scopeIds":["global"],"neededForClaimIds":["claim-boys-without-fathers-public-frame"],"publicSafeNote":"Placeholder source ledger item; publish stronger details only after source review and redaction."}],"confidence":"developing","lastReviewedAt":"2026-06-06"},{"id":"men-under-pressure","slug":"men-under-pressure","title":"Men under pressure","summary":"Cover male suicide, loneliness, work risk, health, addiction, legal vulnerability, financial strain, and institutional blind spots with a repair-first lens.","railId":"men-under-pressure","signals":["Male suicide and overdose trends by age, region, family status, and work status where data allows.","Health and social-service programs that reach men before crisis.","Public narratives that treat male distress as a threat instead of a preventable loss."],"receipts":["WHO, CDC, ONS, Eurostat, OECD, and national mortality/health datasets.","Workplace injury, homelessness, addiction, and loneliness research.","Evaluations of men’s sheds, fatherhood programs, peer support, and community health models."],"openQuestions":["Which services actually reach isolated men before acute crisis?","Where does family breakdown appear in suicide, homelessness, or addiction pathways?"],"repairPaths":["Map repair-oriented male health and belonging models by country.","Collect data sources that can connect family, work, health, and legal pressure."],"atlasLayerIds":["manhood-health","narrative-climate"],"moneyTrailIds":["money-men-pressure"],"depthReport":{"id":"report-men-under-pressure-depth-v1","title":"Men under pressure depth scaffold","summary":"Public-safe depth scaffold for this dossier: current claim, source need, counterargument, refutation standard, and repair path before stronger claims are promoted.","status":"draft_public_scaffold","reportHref":null,"scopeIds":["global"],"updatedAt":"2026-06-06"},"claims":[{"id":"claim-men-under-pressure-public-frame","text":"Male suicide and overdose trends by age, region, family status, and work status where data allows.","confidence":"developing","evidenceLevel":"Public scaffold source request","sourceIds":["src-men-under-pressure-public-source-request"],"scopeIds":["global"],"counterargument":"This frame may be too broad until jurisdiction-specific sources and counterexamples are attached.","refutationStandard":"Attach stronger public sources, counterexamples, or outcome data that materially changes the claim.","repairPath":"Keep the claim in scaffold status until receipts, source gaps, and public-safe remedies are reviewed."}],"sourceLedger":[{"id":"src-men-under-pressure-public-source-request","title":"Men under pressure public source packet","sourceType":"official_or_research_source_request","publisher":null,"url":null,"verificationStatus":"source_requested","scopeIds":["global"],"neededForClaimIds":["claim-men-under-pressure-public-frame"],"publicSafeNote":"Placeholder source ledger item; publish stronger details only after source review and redaction."}],"confidence":"developing","lastReviewedAt":"2026-06-06"},{"id":"narrative-watch-topic","slug":"narrative-watch-topic","title":"What mainstream stories leave out","summary":"Compare public framing against sources: omitted fathers, omitted child outcomes, omitted incentives, missing counterarguments, and claims that travel faster than evidence.","railId":"narrative-watch-topic","signals":["Coverage that mentions fathers only as risks, absences, or payment sources.","Policy stories where funding, vendors, enforcement markets, or advocacy incentives are not named.","Headlines that erase children’s relationship losses while centering institutional language."],"receipts":["Original studies, official statistics, budget lines, and policy texts behind a public claim.","Funding disclosures, grant announcements, charity filings, lobbying records, and vendor contracts.","Corrections, caveats, and counter-evidence from credible primary sources."],"openQuestions":["What would a reader believe after the headline, and what would they know after the sources?","Who benefits from the frame and who is made invisible?"],"repairPaths":["Publish source checks that separate fact, frame, omission, and unknown.","Attach a money-trail note when funding or service markets shape the public story."],"atlasLayerIds":["narrative-climate","gender-policy-power"],"moneyTrailIds":["money-narrative-watch"],"depthReport":{"id":"report-narrative-watch-topic-depth-v1","title":"What mainstream stories leave out depth scaffold","summary":"Public-safe depth scaffold for this dossier: current claim, source need, counterargument, refutation standard, and repair path before stronger claims are promoted.","status":"draft_public_scaffold","reportHref":null,"scopeIds":["global"],"updatedAt":"2026-06-06"},"claims":[{"id":"claim-narrative-watch-topic-public-frame","text":"Coverage that mentions fathers only as risks, absences, or payment sources.","confidence":"developing","evidenceLevel":"Public scaffold source request","sourceIds":["src-narrative-watch-topic-public-source-request"],"scopeIds":["global"],"counterargument":"This frame may be too broad until jurisdiction-specific sources and counterexamples are attached.","refutationStandard":"Attach stronger public sources, counterexamples, or outcome data that materially changes the claim.","repairPath":"Keep the claim in scaffold status until receipts, source gaps, and public-safe remedies are reviewed."}],"sourceLedger":[{"id":"src-narrative-watch-topic-public-source-request","title":"What mainstream stories leave out public source packet","sourceType":"official_or_research_source_request","publisher":null,"url":null,"verificationStatus":"source_requested","scopeIds":["global"],"neededForClaimIds":["claim-narrative-watch-topic-public-frame"],"publicSafeNote":"Placeholder source ledger item; publish stronger details only after source review and redaction."}],"confidence":"developing","lastReviewedAt":"2026-06-06"},{"id":"positive-ledger","slug":"positive-ledger","title":"What works and should spread","summary":"Put good models on the same front page as failures: shared parenting reforms, restored contact, good judges, mentoring, father programs, and community repair.","railId":"positive-ledger","signals":["Laws or court practices that preserve safe meaningful contact with both fit parents.","Programs that publish outcomes and can be copied beyond one charismatic founder.","Local leaders who reduce conflict, restore responsibility, and protect children."],"receipts":["Legislation, implementation guidance, before/after court metrics, and independent evaluations.","Program audits, published outcomes, funding sources, and referral criteria.","Peer-reviewed shared-parenting, fatherhood, mentoring, and family-restoration research."],"openQuestions":["What made the model work: law, leadership, funding, culture, or measurement?","Can the model protect safety while resisting unnecessary permanent family rupture?"],"repairPaths":["Create a copybook of reforms with source links and implementation notes.","Invite local leads to submit receipts for models worth copying."],"atlasLayerIds":["positive-wins"],"moneyTrailIds":["money-positive-ledger"],"depthReport":{"id":"report-positive-ledger-depth-v1","title":"What works and should spread depth scaffold","summary":"Public-safe depth scaffold for this dossier: current claim, source need, counterargument, refutation standard, and repair path before stronger claims are promoted.","status":"draft_public_scaffold","reportHref":null,"scopeIds":["global"],"updatedAt":"2026-06-06"},"claims":[{"id":"claim-positive-ledger-public-frame","text":"Laws or court practices that preserve safe meaningful contact with both fit parents.","confidence":"developing","evidenceLevel":"Public scaffold source request","sourceIds":["src-positive-ledger-public-source-request"],"scopeIds":["global"],"counterargument":"This frame may be too broad until jurisdiction-specific sources and counterexamples are attached.","refutationStandard":"Attach stronger public sources, counterexamples, or outcome data that materially changes the claim.","repairPath":"Keep the claim in scaffold status until receipts, source gaps, and public-safe remedies are reviewed."}],"sourceLedger":[{"id":"src-positive-ledger-public-source-request","title":"What works and should spread public source packet","sourceType":"official_or_research_source_request","publisher":null,"url":null,"verificationStatus":"source_requested","scopeIds":["global"],"neededForClaimIds":["claim-positive-ledger-public-frame"],"publicSafeNote":"Placeholder source ledger item; publish stronger details only after source review and redaction."}],"confidence":"developing","lastReviewedAt":"2026-06-06"}],"meta":{"total":9,"page":1,"limit":9,"updatedAt":"2026-08-19T16:16:32.370Z","version":"v1"}}